Skip to content

Exciting Upcoming Matches in the Scottish Championship

Tomorrow promises to be an exhilarating day for fans of the Scottish Championship as several pivotal matches are set to unfold. The competition is fierce, with teams battling for supremacy and points in this thrilling league. Each match holds significant importance, not just for the standings but also for the bragging rights that come with a victory. Whether you're a die-hard supporter or a casual observer, tomorrow's fixtures are sure to captivate and entertain.

With expert analysis and predictions, we delve into the key matchups, player performances to watch, and potential outcomes that could shake up the league table. Betting enthusiasts will find this an opportune time to place their wagers, as we provide insights into which teams might have the edge.

Detailed Match Previews

Hamilton Academical vs. Dundee United

One of the most anticipated clashes of the day is between Hamilton Academical and Dundee United. Both teams are in desperate need of points to climb up the table, making this match a must-watch. Hamilton Academical has shown resilience at home, with their defensive solidity being a key factor in their recent performances.

On the other hand, Dundee United boasts a dynamic attacking lineup that could pose a serious threat to Hamilton's defense. The clash is expected to be tightly contested, with both sides eager to claim all three points.

  • Key Players: Look out for Hamilton's goalkeeper, who has been instrumental in keeping clean sheets, and Dundee United's forward line, known for their pace and finishing ability.
  • Betting Prediction: A draw seems likely given both teams' current form and the stakes involved.

Inverness Caledonian Thistle vs. Greenock Morton

Inverness Caledonian Thistle will host Greenock Morton in what promises to be a thrilling encounter. Inverness has been struggling with consistency this season, but they have the quality to turn things around when it matters most.

Greenock Morton, on the other hand, has been impressive on their travels and will look to extend their unbeaten run away from home. This match could go either way, with both teams having the potential to secure a win.

  • Key Players: Inverness's midfield maestro is expected to play a crucial role in dictating the tempo of the game, while Morton's goalkeeper will need to be at his best to thwart Inverness's attacking threats.
  • Betting Prediction: An away win for Greenock Morton is a possibility given their recent form.

Ross County vs. Partick Thistle

Ross County welcomes Partick Thistle in what is expected to be a high-octane clash. Ross County has been one of the standout teams this season, with their attacking prowess being particularly noteworthy.

Partick Thistle will look to disrupt Ross County's rhythm and capitalize on any defensive lapses. The match is likely to be open-ended, with plenty of goals on offer.

  • Key Players: Ross County's striker is in excellent form and could be pivotal in breaking down Partick Thistle's defense.
  • Betting Prediction: Over 2.5 goals seems likely given both teams' attacking capabilities.

Dunfermline Athletic vs. St Johnstone

Dunfermline Athletic hosts St Johnstone in a match that could have significant implications for both teams. Dunfermline has been struggling recently but will be eager to bounce back against St Johnstone.

St Johnstone has been solid defensively but needs to find more consistency in front of goal. This match could see Dunfermline springing a surprise if they can capitalize on St Johnstone's defensive vulnerabilities.

  • Key Players: Dunfermline's creative midfielder could be key in unlocking St Johnstone's defense.
  • Betting Prediction: A home win for Dunfermline is possible if they can exploit St Johnstone's defensive frailties.

Ayr United vs. Arbroath

Ayr United takes on Arbroath in what is expected to be a closely contested affair. Ayr United has shown flashes of brilliance this season but needs more consistency.

Arbroath will look to cause an upset and secure all three points away from home. The match could be decided by individual moments of brilliance or defensive errors.

  • Key Players: Ayr United's winger could be instrumental in breaking down Arbroath's defense with his pace and dribbling skills.
  • Betting Prediction: A draw seems likely given both teams' current form and ambitions.

Falkirk vs. Queen of the South

Falkirk hosts Queen of the South in what promises to be an intriguing encounter. Falkirk has been performing well at home but needs to maintain that momentum against Queen of the South.

Queen of the South has been resilient away from home and will look to continue their strong performances on the road. This match could see Falkirk leveraging their home advantage or Queen of the South proving their away prowess.

  • Key Players: Falkirk's central defender will need to marshal his defense effectively against Queen of the South's attacking threats.
  • Betting Prediction: Under 2.5 goals could be on the cards given both teams' recent defensive records.

Expert Betting Predictions

Hamilton Academical vs. Dundee United

<|repo_name|>konojunya/ghc<|file_sep|>/compiler/GHC/Plugins/Parsing/ParserUtils.hs {-# LANGUAGE CPP #-} {-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-} {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} module GHC.Plugins.Parsing.ParserUtils where import Control.Monad import Control.Monad.IO.Class (MonadIO(..)) import Data.Foldable (toList) import Data.List.NonEmpty (NonEmpty(..), nonEmpty) import Data.Maybe (fromMaybe) import Data.String import GHC import GHC.Core import GHC.Core.Opt.CSE import GHC.Core.TyCo.Reify import GHC.Driver.Env import GHC.Driver.Ppr import GHC.Hs import GHC.Plugins.Types import GHC.Plugins.TypeUtils import qualified Data.ByteString.Char8 as B8 #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) import GHC.Plugins.Internal.GhcPluginsCompat (fromRdrName) #endif -- | @parseModule s@ parses 'RdrName's from @s@ into a list of top-level bindings, -- along with any errors encountered during parsing. parseModule :: MonadIO m => String -> m ([(String, Located RdrName)], [ParseError]) parseModule s = do #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) parseModule' s >>= case #else parseModule' s >>= case #endif ParseOk m _ -> pure ([], getTopBindings m) ParseFailed errs -> pure ([], errs) parseModule' :: MonadIO m => String -> m ParseResult GhcPsModule GhcPsBinds GhcPsDecs GhcPsType GhcPsExpr GhcPsStmt GhcPsLHsDecl GhcPsLHsExpr GhcPsLHsPat GhcPsLHsType GhcPsLHsQSpec GhcPsLHsBinds GhcPsLHsBndr GhcPsLHsBndrs GhcPsLHsLocId -> m ParseResult GhcPsModule GhcPsBinds GhcPsDecs GhcPsType GhcPsExpr GhcPsStmt GhcPsLHsDecl GhcPsLHsExpr GhcPsLHsPat GhcPsLHsType GhcPsLHsQSpec GhcPsLHsBinds GhcPsLHsBndr GhcPsLHsBndrs GhcPsLHsLocId parseModule' s = do #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) _ <- liftIO $ runGhc (Just libdir) $ do #else _ <- liftIO $ runGhc (Just libdir) $ do #endif -- TODO: maybe allow setting other options? setSessionDynFlags defaultDynFlags { hscTarget = HscInterpreted } -- TODO: this is not ideal; it should not depend on compiler settings like this... -- TODO: is there any way around this? setPluginHooks $ defaultPluginHooks { pprPanic = const (pure ()) } parseModuleWithComments s getTopBindings :: MonadIO m => HscEnv -> m [(String, Located RdrName)] getTopBindings hsc_env = do #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) -- TODO: we should make sure these are exactly equivalent; -- it would be nice if we didn't have different APIs here... let top_bindings = fmap ((_, x) -> x) $ getOrphans $ hscEnvOrphanDecls hsc_env -- If there are no top-level bindings returned by 'getOrphans', -- then try using 'hsGetParsedSource'. if null top_bindings then do -- See https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/16874; it seems that sometimes -- getOrphans returns nothing even though there are top-level declarations. hs_mod <- hsGetParsedSource Nothing hsc_env let top_bindings = case hs_mod_source hs_mod of HsValD ls | null ls -> [] | otherwise -> fmap ((_, x) -> x) ls HsModD ls | null ls -> [] | otherwise -> fmap ((_, x) -> x) ls ++ getTopBindingsFromDataDecls hs_mod_source hs_mod HsGroupD ls | null ls -> [] | otherwise -> fmap ((_, x) -> x) ls ++ getTopBindingsFromDataDecls hs_mod_source hs_mod _ -> [] pure top_bindings else pure top_bindings #else let top_bindings = fmap ((_, x) -> x) $ getOrphans $ hscEnvOrphanDecls hsc_env let hs_mod = hscGetParsedSource Nothing hsc_env let top_bindings_from_hsmod = case hs_mod_source hs_mod of HsValD ls | null ls -> [] | otherwise -> fmap ((_, x) -> x) ls HsModD ls | null ls -> [] | otherwise -> fmap ((_, x) -> x) ls ++ getTopBindingsFromDataDecls hs_mod_source hs_mod HsGroupD ls | null ls -> [] | otherwise -> fmap ((_, x) -> x) ls ++ getTopBindingsFromDataDecls hs_mod_source hs_mod _ -> [] pure (top_bindings ++ top_bindings_from_hsmod) #endif -- | @getTopBindingsFromDataDecls decl_src mod@ extracts all top-level bindings from data declarations @decl_src@ found in @mod@. getTopBindingsFromDataDecls :: MonadIO m => HsDecl SrcSpanInfo -> HscSource -> m [(String, Located RdrName)] getTopBindingsFromDataDecls decl_src mod = #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) case decl_src of #else case decl_src of {- HsDataDefn lqname ty_vars cons _deriving -> fmap (x@(Located _ n@(Unqual _)) -> (lqnameFS lqname, case n `elem` ty_vars of {- True -> Located lqnameFS lqname $ Unqual $ mkRdrQual lqnameFS $ mkRdrVar n {-TODO: I don't think this should depend on 'lqnameFS'...-} False -> Located lqnameFS lqname n -} ) <$> nonEmpty cons -} HsNewtypeDefn lqname ty_vars con _deriving -> fmap (x@(Located _ n@(Unqual _)) -> (lqnameFS lqname, case n `elem` ty_vars of {- True -> Located lqnameFS lqname $ Unqual $ mkRdrQual lqnameFS $ mkRdrVar n {-TODO: I don't think this should depend on 'lqnameFS'...-} False -> Located lqnameFS lqname n -} ) <$> nonEmpty [con] {-TODO: I don't think there should only ever be one constructor-} -}_ #endif HsDataDefn{} -> pure . concatMap extractDataDecl mod_decls_data_decls where mod_decls_data_decls = getModDeclsDataDecls mod_decls mod_body -- TODO: make sure these two functions are equivalent! HsNewtypeDefn{} -> pure . concatMap extractNewtypeDecl mod_decls_data_decls where mod_decls_data_decls = getModDeclsDataDecls mod_decls mod_body -- TODO: make sure these two functions are equivalent! _ -> pure [] -- | @extractDataDecl decl@ extracts all top-level bindings from data declaration @decl@. extractDataDecl :: MonadIO m => HsDataDefn SrcSpanInfo -> m [(String,LitPlaceholder)] extractDataDecl (HsDataDefn lqname ty_vars cons _deriving) #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) = concat <$> traverse extractConstructor cons <* traverse extractTyVar ty_vars where {-# SCC extractConstructor #-} #else = concat <$> traverse extractConstructor cons <* traverse extractTyVar ty_vars where {-# SCC extractConstructor #-} #endif -- | @extractNewtypeDecl decl@ extracts all top-level bindings from newtype declaration @decl@. extractNewtypeDecl :: MonadIO m => HsNewtypeDefn SrcSpanInfo -> m [(String,LitPlaceholder)] extractNewtypeDecl (HsNewtypeDefn lqname ty_vars con _deriving) #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) = concat <$> traverse extractConstructor [con] <* traverse extractTyVar ty_vars where {-# SCC extractConstructor #-} #else = concat <$> traverse extractConstructor [con] <* traverse extractTyVar ty_vars where {-# SCC extractConstructor #-} #endif -- | @extractTyVar tv@ extracts any type variable bindings from @tv@. extractTyVar :: MonadIO m => TyVarBndr SrcSpanInfo -> m [(String,LitPlaceholder)] extractTyVar tv@(PlainTV name) #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) = pure [(litPlaceholder name,toRdrName name)] extractTyVar tv@(KindedTV name _) = pure [] #elif MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,2,0) = pure [(litPlaceholder name,toRdrName name)] extractTyVar tv@(KindedTV name _) = pure [] #else = pure [(litPlaceholder name,toRdrName name)] extractTyVar tv@(KindedTV name _) = pure [] #endif -- | @extractConstructor c@ extracts any constructor bindings from @cons@. extractConstructor :: MonadIO m => ConLike SrcSpanInfo () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () -> m [(String,LitPlaceholder)] #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,4,0) -- TODO: it seems like there are constructors which have no fields; -- does that mean that they cannot have type variable bindings? -- Or does it just mean that they have no fields? -- It seems like there shouldn't be any constructors without type variables though... extractConstructor c@(RecC name fields) = extractRecordConFields c *> pure [(litPlaceholder name,toRdrName name)] extractConstructor c@(NormalC name fields) = concat <$> traverse extractConField fields <* pure [(litPlaceholder name,toRdrName name)] extractConstructor c@(InfixC field1 con field2) = concat <$> traverse extractConField [field1] <* traverse extractConField [field2] -- TODO: figure out what kind of data constructor 'ForallC' actually is... -- We assume it doesn't have any type variable bindings... -- -- Also note that if you're using record syntax then you may need some sort of record syntax extension enabled; -- see https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/16874. #if !MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,6) -- This case doesn't seem necessary because it looks like 'ForallC' -- always gets desugared into 'RecC'. -- -- I'm not sure why it still exists though... #elif !MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,8) #else #elif !MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,10) #else #endif extractConstructor c@(ForallC ty_var_bndrs ctx con) #if MIN_VERSION_ghc(9,6) -- NOTE: I don't think there should be any record syntax